Reason Why Climate Action Is Very Important

 

It should be troubling enough that temperatures are rising, glaciers are melting, and Arctic sea ice is disappearing so fast that walruses often lounge about on land.

But scientists pushing world leaders to forge a global climate-change agreement in Paris increasingly are uncovering more urgent warning signs. We asked scientists to identify what worries them the most.

The West Antarctic Ice Sheet






















Since the 1970s warming ocean waters have melted a significant section of ice in the Amundsen Sea in the Southern Ocean – so much that collapse of a far greater mass of ice may be inevitable. Scientists from NASA and elsewhere, based on a half-dozen studies in the past two years, now believe it may be too late to stop  so much Antarctic ice from melting that it would send sea levels rising 16 feet more, inundating regions home to hundreds of millions of people. What may still be possible, however, is for humans to control just when that might happen.

Antarctica's South Dakota-sized Thwaites Glacier has dwindled so substantially in recent decades that it is now held in place by a weak tongue of ice. Thwaites and the melting of another nearby glacier already are causing a modest amount of sea level rise – even as thousands of years of excessive cold to the east means the amount of Antarctic snow and ice overall is still growing. The problem: Once Thwaites goes completely it would likely destabilize other sections of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, triggering a far more massive melt. No one can say how much we need to thwart rising temperatures to keep this melting to a trickle. But many scientists seem to agree in principle: Curb emissions fast enough, and this expected collapse could stretch out over several thousand years – plenty of time for humans to prepare. But if we don't act with haste, the collapse could be well underway by the end of this century. "What keeps you up at night is that the thresholds are often not well-defined," says Jason Smerdon, with Columbia University's Earth Institute. "At some point, they can cause very rapid changes in the system. But exactly when is hard to pin down."

Melting Permafrost




On the opposite side of the globe there's another looming issue, but this one remains buried underground–at least for now. Permafrost, the icy frozen crust of shrubs and grass found throughout the Arctic, has kept billions of tons of carbon trapped for thousands of years. But as Arctic sea ice melts in summer, its blinding whiteness is no longer there to reflect the sun's rays. Instead, the dark ocean surface absorbs more sun and heat. That warmth speeds up the thawing of permafrost from Siberia to Alaska's Brooks Range. Then things get ugly, potentially transforming the landscape into something climate scientists fear: a feedback loop.

When that permafrost melts, the underlying plants decompose, releasing carbon dioxide and more-potent methane in great quantities that can worsen climate change. That, in turn, would melt more permafrost, and release even more greenhouse gases. Just last week, scientists revealed that Alaska alone could lose 24 percent of its permafrost by 2100. In fact scientists suspect that in the worst case scenario 70 percent of Arctic permafrost could thaw. That act alone could release 20 to 100 times more CO2 than the United States burns in a year, causing another $43 trillion in damages globally.


Spreading diseases




Warm weather is increasing the number and range of ticks, midges, and mosquitoes–those that carry human disease, such as dengue fever, and those that don't but still kill wildlife and livestock. Crop-damaging pathogens are spreading north, threatening food security. Waterborne human viruses may spread. Scientists aren't yet certain how disease-carrying rodents, such as rats and mice, are responding, but one thing is clear: Animals and plants are migrating to new areas and coming into contact with species they’ve never encountered. That can spread existing diseases and let new pathogens emerge.

Climate change could increase the risk of hunger and malnutrition by up to 20% by 2050



Climate change is making it harder to fight hunger. The consequences of climate change include droughts and natural disasters that reduce food supplies and lead to higher food prices, making it harder for many people to get the nourishment they need. The World Food Programme notes that climate change could increase the risk of hunger and malnutrition by up to 20% by 2050.

Climate change could force more than 100 million people into extreme poverty

Climate change is threatening to undo our progress in the fight against global poverty. A World Bank report that came out last year found that without necessary action, climate change could force more than 100 million people into extreme poverty, as they struggle with natural disasters, disease, and rising food prices from crop shortages.

Altered ocean food webs




Negotiators in Paris are trying ­to put the world on a path that keeps global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius. But temperature is not the only problem. Oceans absorb about a quarter of the carbon dioxide we spew into the atmosphere, changing the chemistry of the sea. Marine waters acidify. That alters how ocean creatures from clownfish to walleye pollock see, hear, and smell, causing them to struggle to find prey and to die at far greater rates when fleeing predators.

Equally troubling, the change means waters increasingly hold too little calcium carbonate, which shelled creatures need to develop and grow. Scientists expected this problem to arise late this century, but it's already occurring, harming oysters in the Northwest, threatening king crab in Alaska, and damaging sea snails – an important link in ocean food webs – along the West Coast and in Antarctica. In fact, this problem could affect 30 percent of surface waters in the Southern Ocean in just 45 years – 70 percent by century's end, stretching all the way to the tip of South America. Once it strikes, it takes very little time to harm sea life as much as six months a year. Not long after, the problem will spread to what may be the most important species at the bottom of the Antarctic food web, tiny shrimp-like krill.

Meanwhile, temperatures already tamper with the food web in Alaska, America's seafood capital, which supplies half the nation's catch of fish. In the Bering Sea, pollock – a $500 million-dollar industry that supplies flaky white meat for everything from frozen fish sticks to McDonald's filet sandwiches – subsist on a diet of junk food anytime warming water melts sea ice too early. The less-nutritious plankton that's suddenly the only thing left for young fish to eat makes them too small to survive cold winters. The result: Up to 40 percent fewer adult fish are around to catch or feed other marine life. Some already fear ocean changes are pushing sea life toward mass extinctions.

Climate change could cause 250,000 additional deaths per year between 2030 and 2050

The effects of climate change – from polluted air to extreme heat to the spread of diseases – will have a significant negative impact on public health. According to the World Health Organization, “climate change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year between 2030 and 2050; 38,000 due to heat exposure in elderly people, 48,000 due to diarrhea, 60,000 due to malaria, and 95,000 due to childhood undernutrition.”

While the statistics are sobering, there is reason for optimism: Taking strong climate action will not only help negate these impacts, but will also have significant sustainable development benefits – to improve health, create economic opportunities, and help families thrive.

For example, sustainable energy solutions such as solar and wind power connect people to the light and energy they need to more effectively study, cook, and run businesses, even while protecting the planet by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says, “Saving our planet, lifting people out of poverty, advancing economic growth … these are one and the same fight.”

Last year, in addition to agreeing to Sustainable Development Goals, global leaders came together in Paris around an ambitious climate agreement. Now they need to implement it – for the sake of the planet and people living in poverty.

These are the few reasons why we should take climate change seriously and  be responsible global citizens. 

Follow us on TwitterFeel free to comment on the blog and give us your valuable feedback.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thackeray Family Runs The Underworld

How Have Countries Around The World Responded To Climate Change

Why Should Everyone Take Climate Change Seriously And Plan For It